Tuesday, October 31, 2023
Friday, October 27, 2023
沙特Jean-Paul Sartre 在新潮文庫、American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer 2005
American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer 索引中有沙特,查一下可能有意外....
英文書有索引比較有用,有趣:
沙特在新潮文庫
沙特論文學
榆樹鎮上:三浦朱門、曾野綾子印象 (殷允芃 中國人的光輝及其他:當代名人訪問錄 )
新潮文庫版本叫《中國人的光輝:當代名人訪問錄》台北:志文,1971;台北:天下雜誌,2011
中國人的光輝及其他:當代名人訪問錄
作者:殷允芃
出版社:天下雜誌
出版日期:2011年
6月21日
沙特(Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre)
(西元1905.6.21—1980.4.15)
法國哲學家及作家。存在主義哲學的大師,提倡激進的自由意志主義。於二戰期間投身反抗運動。代表作《存在與虛無》被視為法國存在主義運動的奠基之作。另有長篇小說《自由之路》等作品。
作家唯一的機會只出現在自己的時代中。時代為了作家而延續,作家也為了時代而誕生。很遺憾地,巴爾札克對四十八年事變(二月革命)毫不關心,福樓拜也不了解巴黎公社且戰戰兢兢,而我是為他們而感到遺憾。因為,他們已經在各自的時代中,永遠失去了某些東西。我們不想在我們的時代中失去任何東西。未來或許會出現更美好的時代,但此刻是屬於我們的時代。我們身處這場戰爭,恐怕該稱為這場革命中,必須、也只能為了活出這段人生而挺身奮鬥。
節自 評論雜誌《現代》之創刊辭
----
Jean-Paul Sartre, a Marxist existentialist philosopher and writer who won the Nobel Prize for Literature, described the trial as
"a legal lynching which smears with blood a whole nation. By killing the Rosenbergs, you have quite simply tried to halt the progress of science by human sacrifice. Magic, witch-hunts, autos-da-fé, sacrifices – we are here getting to the point: your country is sick with fear ... you are afraid of the shadow of your own bomb."[34]
---
《無所不談》有兩篇關於法國明星 Brigitte Bardot (碧姬芭杜):、〈論碧姬芭杜的頭髮〉。
林語堂是/屬大師級,〈從碧姬芭杜小姐說起〉一文,碧姬芭杜是引言,主要開始介紹存在主義大師沙特 (林譯:薩爾忒Jean-Paul Sartre,接下專篇〈說薩爾忒〉
Wednesday, October 25, 2023
A Room of One's Own; And, Three Guineas (Oxford World's Classics) vs. 沒系統編輯:《自己的房間》《戴洛維夫人》《航向燈塔》《奧蘭多》《女人的時間》Hours in a library | Virginia Woolf
THE-TLS.CO.UK
Hours in a library | Virginia Woolf
中文出版界多不知道 Virginia Woolf的《自己的房間》A Room of One's Own與 《三枚舊金幣》Three Guineas 是一以貫之的,後者是前書出版之後,經十年的苦思之成果。
這是Oxford World's Classics 叢書版的優點。
A Room of One's Own; And, Three Guineas (Oxford World's Classics)Paperback – December 1, 2008
In A Room of One's Own and Three Guineas, Virginia Woolf considers with energy and wit the implications of the historical exclusion of women from education and from economic independence. In A Room of One's Own (1929), she examines the work of past women writers, and looks ahead to a time when women's creativity will not be hampered by poverty, or by oppression. In Three Guineas (1938), however, Woolf argues that women's historical exclusion offers them the chance to form a political and cultural identity which could challenge the drive towards fascism and war.
奧蘭多
中文書 , 維琴妮亞、吳爾夫 陳惠華/譯 , 志文 , 出版日期: 2004-01-30《奧蘭多》是英國才女維琴妮亞‧吳爾夫的一部自傳色彩濃郁的小說。這本奇妙的歷史幻想故事,主人公奧蘭多穿越過從伊麗莎白王朝到二十世紀的時空,從男人變成女人,這部作品可以說是作者的異想結晶。 雖然本書號稱「傳記」,卻是純粹的虛構故事,藉此...... more戴洛維夫人
中文書 , 維琴妮亞‧吳爾夫 陳惠華 , 志文 , 出版日期: 2000-09-15自己的房間:女性文學.小說面面觀 或譯 自己的一間屋
中文書 , 維琴妮亞.吳爾夫 陳惠華 , 志文 , 出版日期: 2006-03-01維琴妮亞.吳爾夫的小說《戴洛維夫人》《航向燈塔》《美麗佳人奧蘭多》等已成為20世紀文學作品鮮明的里程碑。 《自己的房間》則是作者對文學觀點和欣賞角度的現身說法。她開宗明義在書中指出「女人如果要寫小說或詩,五百英鎊的年收入和上鎖的房間是...... more
Monday, October 23, 2023
1967年2封
https://www.facebook.com/hanching.chung/videos/854130259394531
19670527 東海
孝廉:
接到你來信,使我一陣喜悅。信中說你有點怕我,那是我的不對,為什麼使自己的學生不敢親近我呢?只有真正有慧根的人才有你信中流露的許多感觸,這是非常難得的。過去我認為你有才氣有向前突進的精神;但你浮而不實,粗而不密;這樣便不易真正到學問的內部去。只要不求速效,不ㄩˋ小成;一方面寫些真正發自內心所感受到的散文(應當繼續寫,但不可多寫。寫後再三修改);一面有計畫地切實讀幾部有價值的書;細細地讀。慢慢地讀。隨讀隨寫扎記或摘抄。有一點沒把握的,絕不放鬆,自求解答;或和朋友辯難,或向老師請益。這樣花兩三年功夫,便真正站起來了。但一定要把英文念通,再念日文。或者先花一年時間集中到外國語文方面,為一生作學問作打算。這種苦功夫一定要下的。一切學問皆從艱苦中得來;要能忍受剋制。你在校多留一年,對你有好處。祝好
徐復觀五六 五 二七
下段,不知應插入何處。
“做學問是要做到死時為止,最重要的是不可壞了基礎。”
19670608
Sunday, October 22, 2023
日本「直木賞」得主東山彰良先生 蒞臨東海大學演講報導2017-05-25。王孝廉著作 (部分)《哲學‧文學‧藝術》1986王孝廉 張桐生編譯(桐生為日本之一姓氏。此或值得談談)
日本「直木賞」得主東山彰良先生 蒞臨本校演講
- 單位 : 資料維護
- 分類 : 東大新聞
- 點閱 : 2357
- 日期 : 2017-05-25
被稱為日本大眾文學最高榮譽的「直木賞」得主東山彰良(本名王震緒)先生,於106年5月11日蒞臨本校求真廳演講,以「作家になるまで-作家之路-」為題,暢談成為名作家的心路歷程與創作的甘苦,並舉行簽書會,得到眾師生的熱烈迴響。本活動由文學院主辦,日文系及通識中心協辦,因此會後更在日文系舉辦面對面座談會,進一步分享自己的文學觀與寫作習慣。
東山先生出生於台北,5歲時移居日本。筆名「東山」取自父親祖籍山東省,「彰」則因母親曾在彰化任教。他以推理小說出道,並曾為日本著名動漫作品「NARUTO火影忍者」電影版撰寫劇本。2015年7月以小說《流》一舉拿下直木賞,在文壇備受矚目,也是史上第3位獲得日本直木賞的台灣作家。《流》以70年代的台灣為背景,融入了作者本身及父親的真實成長經驗,其明快的節奏與充滿畫面感的描寫手法,被譽為日本文壇的新潮流,更助長了日本各年齡層的讀者對台灣的好奇心和懷念之情。
東山彰良先生(左一)回答觀眾提問
而東山先生的父親王孝廉先生,是研究中國文學的著名學者,同時也是一名小說家,現為九州西南學院大學的榮譽教授(西南學院大學亦為本校日本地區姊妹校)。值得一提的是,東山先生的父親與母親張桐生女士,分別為本校中文系第9屆與歷史系第10屆的校友,因此除了舉行演講活動外,東山先生此行另一個重要目的,即是攜雙親回母校訪視,重溫近半世紀前的回憶。
東山先生表示,雖然是第一次來到本校,但十分珍惜與東海大學的緣份,也期待將來能再度到本校進行更深入的交流。
------
王孝廉編譯《哲學‧文學‧藝術》1986、張桐生....〈〉
王孝廉編譯:(日本漢學研究論集)《哲學‧文學‧藝術》(台北:時報文化,1986)
小川環樹(Ogawa Tamaki,1910~)總結樂園八個特點,見小川環樹著,張桐生譯,
目次
岡田武彥: 〈中國哲學的課題與簡古精神〉王孝廉譯
岡田武彥:〈新儒學與日本〉 , 王孝廉譯
岡田武彥: 〈宋明的實學及其源流 〉 , 王孝廉譯
第二輯 中國文學的仙鄉
藤田佑賢〈蒲松齡(1640年-1715年)與聊齋志異〉王孝廉譯
小川環樹(Ogawa Tamaki,1910~)著,〈中國魏晉以後(三世紀以降)的仙鄉故事〉張桐生譯,
第三輯 線與面的藝術
貝塚茂樹,〈中國魏藝術與文化的特質〉張桐生譯
〈幽玄之美---日本能劇的藝術〉王孝廉編譯
|
Erich Seligmann Fromm 作品及漢譯
This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2007)
Erich Seligmann Fromm
Fromm in 1970
Full name Erich Seligmann Fromm
Born March 23, 1900
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Died March 18, 1980 (aged 79)
Switzerland
Era 20th century
Region Western philosophy
School Frankfurt School, critical theory, humanistic psychoanalysis, Humanistic Judaism
Main interests Social theory, Marxism
Notable ideas Being and Having Modes of Existence; Security versus Freedom; Social character
Influenced by[show]
Spinoza, Eckhart, Kierkegaard, Marx, Freud, Alfred Weber
Part of a series on the
Frankfurt School
Major works
Reason and Revolution
Dialectic of Enlightenment
Minima Moralia
Eros and Civilization
One-Dimensional Man
Negative Dialectics
The Theory of Communicative Action
Notable theorists
Max Horkheimer · Theodor Adorno
Herbert Marcuse · Walter Benjamin
Franz Neumann · Friedrich Pollock
Erich Fromm · Leo Löwenthal
Helmut Reichelt · Jürgen Habermas
Important concepts
Critical theory · Dialectic · Praxis
Psychoanalysis · Antipositivism
Popular culture · Culture industry
Advanced capitalism · Privatism
v • d • e
Erich Seligmann[1] Fromm (March 23, 1900 – March 18, 1980) was a German social psychologist, psychoanalyst, humanistic philosopher, and democratic socialist. He was associated with what became known as the Frankfurt School of critical theory.
Contents [hide] 1 Life
2 Psychological theory 2.1 Five orientations
2.2 Fromm's influence on other notable psychologists
3 Critique of Freud
4 Political ideas and activities
5 Criticism
6 Bibliography 6.1 Early work in German
6.2 Later works in English
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
[edit] Life
Erich Fromm was born on 23 March 1900, at Frankfurt am Main, the only child of Orthodox Jewish parents. He started his academic studies in 1918 at the University of Frankfurt am Main with two semesters of jurisprudence. During the summer semester of 1919, Fromm studied at the University of Heidelberg, where he switched from studying jurisprudence to sociology under Alfred Weber (brother of the better known sociologist Max Weber), the psychiatrist-philosopher Karl Jaspers, and Heinrich Rickert. Fromm received his Ph.D. in sociology from Heidelberg in 1922. And, then during the mid 1920s, he was trained to become a psychoanalyst through Frieda Reichmann's psychoanalytic sanatorium in Heidelberg. He began his own clinical practice in 1927. In 1930, he joined the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research and completed his psychoanalytical training. After the Nazi takeover of power in Germany, Fromm moved to Geneva and then, in 1934, to Columbia University in New York. Karen Horney's long-term infatuation with Fromm is the subject of her book Self Analysis and it is reasonable to believe that each had a lasting influence on the other's thought. After leaving Columbia, Fromm helped form the New York branch of the Washington School of Psychiatry in 1943, and in 1946 co-founded the William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and Psychology. He was on the faculty of Bennington College from 1941-1950.
When Fromm moved to Mexico City in 1950, he became a professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico and established a psychoanalytic section at the medical school there. He taught at UNAM until his retirement in 1965. Meanwhile, he taught as a professor of psychology at Michigan State University from 1957 to 1961 and as an adjunct professor of psychology at the graduate division of Arts and Sciences at New York University after 1962. In 1974 he moved to Muralto (or Locarno?), Switzerland, and died at his home in 1980, five days before his eightieth birthday. All the while, Fromm maintained his own clinical practice and published a series of books.
[edit] Psychological theory
Beginning with his first seminal work of 1941, Escape from Freedom (known in Britain as Fear of Freedom), Fromm's writings were notable as much for their social and political commentary as for their philosophical and psychological underpinnings. Indeed, Escape from Freedom is viewed as one of the founding works of Political psychology. His second important work, Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics, first published in 1947, continued and enriched the ideas of Escape from Freedom. Taken together, these books outlined Fromm's theory of human character, which was a natural outgrowth of Fromm's theory of human nature. Fromm's most popular book was The Art of Loving, an international bestseller first published in 1956, which recapitulated and complemented the theoretical principles of human nature found in Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself—principles which were revisited in many of Fromm's other major works.
Central to Fromm's world view was his interpretation of the Talmud, which he began studying as a young man under Rabbi J. Horowitz and later studied under Rabbi Salman Baruch Rabinkow while working towards his doctorate in sociology at the University of Heidelberg and under Nehemia Nobel and Ludwig Krause while studying in Frankfurt. Fromm's grandfather and two great grandfathers on his father's side were rabbis, and a great uncle on his mother's side was a noted Talmudic scholar. However, Fromm turned away from orthodox Judaism in 1926, towards secular interpretations of scriptural ideals.
The cornerstone of Fromm's humanistic philosophy is his interpretation of the biblical story of Adam and Eve's exile from the Garden of Eden. Drawing on his knowledge of the Talmud, Fromm pointed out that being able to distinguish between good and evil is generally considered to be a virtue, and that biblical scholars generally consider Adam and Eve to have sinned by disobeying God and eating from the Tree of Knowledge. However, departing from traditional religious orthodoxy, Fromm extolled the virtues of humans taking independent action and using reason to establish moral values rather than adhering to authoritarian moral values.
Beyond a simple condemnation of authoritarian value systems, Fromm used the story of Adam and Eve as an allegorical explanation for human biological evolution and existential angst, asserting that when Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge, they became aware of themselves as being separate from nature while still being part of it. This is why they felt "naked" and "ashamed": they had evolved into human beings, conscious of themselves, their own mortality, and their powerlessness before the forces of nature and society, and no longer united with the universe as they were in their instinctive, pre-human existence as animals. According to Fromm, the awareness of a disunited human existence is a source of guilt and shame, and the solution to this existential dichotomy is found in the development of one's uniquely human powers of love and reason. However, Fromm distinguished his concept of love from unreflective popular notions as well as Freudian paradoxical love (see criticism by Marcuse below).
Fromm considered love to be an interpersonal creative capacity rather than an emotion, and he distinguished this creative capacity from what he considered to be various forms of narcissistic neuroses and sado-masochistic tendencies that are commonly held out as proof of "true love." Indeed, Fromm viewed the experience of "falling in love" as evidence of one's failure to understand the true nature of love, which he believed always had the common elements of care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge. Drawing from his knowledge of the Torah, Fromm pointed to the story of Jonah, who did not wish to save the residents of Nineveh from the consequences of their sin, as demonstrative of his belief that the qualities of care and responsibility are generally absent from most human relationships. Fromm also asserted that few people in modern society had respect for the autonomy of their fellow human beings, much less the objective knowledge of what other people truly wanted and needed.
Fromm believed that freedom was an aspect of human nature that we either embrace or escape. He observed that embracing our freedom of will was healthy, whereas escaping freedom through the use of escape mechanisms was the root of psychological conflicts. Three main escape mechanisms that Fromm outlined are automaton conformity, authoritarianism, and destructiveness. Automaton conformity is changing one's ideal self to what is perceived as the preferred type of personality of society, losing one's true self. The use of automaton conformity displaces the burden of choice from the self to society. Authoritarianism is allowing oneself to be controlled by another. This removes the freedom of choice almost entirely by submitting that freedom to someone else. Lastly, destructiveness is any process which attempts to eliminate others or the world as a whole to escape freedom. Fromm said that "the destruction of the world is the last, almost desperate attempt to save myself from being crushed by it" (1941).
The word biophilia was frequently used by Fromm as a description of a productive psychological orientation and "state of being". For example, in an addendum to his book The Heart of Man: Its Genius For Good and Evil, Fromm wrote as part of his famous Humanist Credo:
"I believe that the man choosing progress can find a new unity through the development of all his human forces, which are produced in three orientations. These can be presented separately or together: biophilia, love for humanity and nature, and independence and freedom." (c. 1965)
Erich Fromm postulated EIGHT basic needs: Relatedness Relationships with others, care, respect, knowledge.Transcendence Creativity, develop a loving and interesting life.Rootedness Feeling of belonging.Sense of Identity See ourselves as a unique person and part of a social group.Frame of orientation Understand the world and our place in it.Excitation and Stimulation Actively strive for a goal rather than simply respond.Unity A sense of oneness between one person and the "natural and human world outside."Effectiveness The need to feel accomplished.
Fromm's thesis of the "escape from freedom" is epitomized in the following passage. The "individualized man" referenced by Fromm is man bereft of "primary ties" of belonging (nature, family, etc.), also expressed as "freedom from":
"There is only one possible, productive solution for the relationship of individualized man with the world: his active solidarity with all men and his spontaneous activity, love and work, which unite him again with the world, not by primary ties but as a free and independent individual.... However, if the economic, social and political conditions... do not offer a basis for the realization of individuality in the sense just mentioned, while at the same time people have lost those ties which gave them security, this lag makes freedom an unbearable burden. It then becomes identical with doubt, with a kind of life which lacks meaning and direction. Powerful tendencies arise to escape from this kind of freedom into submission or some kind of relationship to man and the world which promises relief from uncertainty, even if it deprives the individual of his freedom." (Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom [N.Y.: Rinehart, 1941], pp. 36-7. The point is repeated on pp. 31, 256-7.)
[edit] Five orientations
Fromm also spoke of "orientation of character" in his book Man For Himself, which describes the ways an individual relates to the world and constitutes his general character, and develops from two specific kinds of relatedness to the world: acquiring and assimilating things ("assimilation"), and reacting to people ("socialization"). Fromm considers these character systems the human substitute for instincts in animals. These orientations describe how a man has developed in regard to how he responds to conflicts in his or her life; he also said that people were never pure in any such orientation. These two factors form four types of malignant character, which he calls Receptive, Exploitative, Hoarding and Marketing. He also described a positive character, which he called Productive.
[edit] Fromm's influence on other notable psychologists
Fromm's four non-productive orientations were subject to validation through a psychometric test, The Person Relatedness Test by Elias H. Porter, Ph.D. in collaboration with Carl Rogers, Ph.D.at the University of Chicago's Counseling Center between 1953 and 1955. Fromm's four non-productive orientations also served as basis for the LIFO test, first published in 1967 by Stuart Atkins, Alan Katcher, Ph.D., and Elias Porter, Ph.D. and the Strength Deployment Inventory, first published in 1971 by Chris H. Porter, Ph.D. [1], [2]
[edit] Critique of Freud
Fromm examined the life and work of Sigmund Freud at length. He identified a discrepancy between early and later Freudian theory: namely that prior to World War I, Freud described human drives as a tension between desire and repression, but after the war's conclusion, he framed human drives as a struggle between biologically-universal Life and Death (Eros and Thanatos) instincts. Fromm charged Freud and his followers with never acknowledging the contradictions between the two theories.
He also criticized Freud's dualistic thinking. According to Fromm, Freudian descriptions of human consciousness as struggles between two poles was narrow and limiting. Fromm also condemned him as a misogynist unable to think outside the patriarchal milieu of early 20th century Vienna. However, Fromm expressed a great respect for Freud and his accomplishments, in spite of these criticisms.
[edit] Political ideas and activities
Fromm's most well-known work, Escape from Freedom, focuses on the human urge to seek a source of authority and control upon reaching a freedom that was thought to be an individual’s true desire. Fromm’s critique of the modern political order and capitalist system led him to seek insights from medieval feudalism. In Escape from Freedom, he found favor with the lack of individual freedom, rigid structure, and obligations required on the members of medieval society:
What characterizes medieval in contrast to modern society is its lack of individual freedom…But altogether a person was not free in the modern sense, neither was he alone and isolated. In having a distinct, unchangeable, and unquestionable place in the social world from the moment of birth, man was rooted in a structuralized whole, and thus life had a meaning which left no place, and no need for doubt…There was comparatively little competition. One was born into a certain economic position which guaranteed a livelihood determined by tradition, just as it carried economic obligations to those higher in the social hierarchy.[2]
The culmination of Fromm's social and political philosophy was his book The Sane Society, published in 1955, which argued in favor of humanistic and democratic socialism. Building primarily upon the early works of Karl Marx, Fromm sought to re-emphasise the ideal of freedom, missing from most Soviet Marxism, and more frequently found in the writings of libertarian socialists and liberal theoreticians. Fromm's brand of socialism rejected both Western capitalism and Soviet communism, which he saw as dehumanizing and that resulted in a virtually universal modern phenomenon of alienation. He became one of the founders of socialist humanism, promoting the early writings of Marx and his humanist messages to the US and Western European publics.
In the early 1960s, Fromm published two books dealing with Marxist thoughts (Marx's Concept of Man and Beyond the Chains of Illusion: my Encounter with Marx and Freud). In 1965, working to stimulate the Western and Eastern cooperation between Marxist humanists, Fromm published a series of articles entitled Socialist Humanism: An International Symposium. In 1966, the American Humanist Association named him Humanist of the Year.
For a period, Fromm was also active in US politics. He joined the Socialist Party of America in the mid-1950s, and did his best to help them provide an alternative viewpoint to the prevailing McCarthyism of the time. This alternative viewpoint was best expressed in his 1961 paper May Man Prevail? An Inquiry into the Facts and Fictions of Foreign Policy. However, as a co-founder of SANE, Fromm's strongest political activism was in the international peace movement, fighting against the nuclear arms race and US involvement in the Vietnam War. After supporting Senator Eugene McCarthy's losing bid for the Democratic presidential nomination, Fromm more or less retreated from the American political scene, although he did write a paper in 1974 entitled Remarks on the Policy of Détente for a hearing held by the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
[edit] Criticism
In Eros and Civilization Herbert Marcuse condemns Fromm, that in the beginning he was a radical theorist who later turned to conformity. Marcuse also argued that Fromm, as well as his close colleagues Sullivan and Karen Horney, removed Freud's libido theory and other radical concepts, which thus reduced psychoanalysis to a set of idealist ethics, which only embrace the status quo.[3] Fromm's response, in both The Sane Society [4] and in The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness,[5] argues that Freud indeed deserves substantial credit for recognizing the central importance of the subconscious, but also that he tended to reify his own concepts that depicted the self as the passive outcome of instinct and social control, with very minimal volition or variability. Fromm argues that later scholars such as Marcuse accepted these concepts as dogma, whereas social-psychology requires a more dynamic theoretical and empirical approach.
[edit] Bibliography
[edit] Early work in German Das jüdische Gesetz. Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie des Diaspora-Judentums., Promotion, 1922. ISBN 3-453-09896-X
Über Methode und Aufgaben einer analytischen Sozialpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, Bd. 1, 1932, S. 28-54.
Die psychoanalytische Charakterologie und ihre Bedeutung für die Sozialpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, Bd. 1, 1932, S. 253-277.
Sozialpsychologischer Teil. In: Studien über Autorität und Familie. Forschungsberichte aus dem Institut für Sozialforschung. Alcan, Paris 1936, S. 77-135.
Zweite Abteilung: Erhebungen (Erich Fromm u.a.). In: Studien über Autorität und Familie. Forschungsberichte aus dem Institut für Sozialforschung. Alcan, Paris 1936, S. 229-469. Die Furcht vor der Freiheit, 1941 (In English, "Fear/Dread of Freedom"). ISBN 3-423-35024-5
Psychoanalyse & Ethik, 1946. ISBN 3-423-35011-3
Psychoanalyse & Religion, 1949. ISBN 3-423-34105-X (The Dwight H. Terry Lectureship 1949/1950)
[edit] Later works in English Escape from Freedom (US), The Fear of Freedom (UK) (1941)
Man for himself, an inquiry into the psychology of ethics (1947)
Psychoanalysis and Religion (1950)
Forgotten language; an introduction to the understanding of dreams, fairy tales, and myths (1951)
The Sane Society (1955)
The Art of Loving (1956)
Sigmund Freud's mission; an analysis of his personality and influence (1959)
Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism (1960)
May Man Prevail? An inquiry into the facts and fictions of foreign policy (1961)
Marx's Concept of Man (1961)
Beyond the Chains of Illusion: my encounter with Marx and Freud (1962)
The Dogma of Christ and Other Essays on Religion, Psychology and Culture (1963)
The Heart of Man, its genius for good and evil (1964)
Socialist Humanism (1965)
You Shall Be as Gods: a radical interpretation of the Old Testament and its tradition (1966)
The Revolution of Hope, toward a humanized technology (1968)
The Nature of Man (1968)
The Crisis of Psychoanalysis (1970)
Social character in a Mexican village; a sociopsychoanalytic study (Fromm & Maccoby) (1970)
The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973)
To Have or to Be? (1976)
Greatness and Limitation of Freud's Thought (1979)
On Disobedience and other essays (1984)
The Art of Being (1993)
The Art of Listening (1994)
On Being Human (1997)
[edit] See also American philosophy
List of American philosophers
[edit] References
^ Funk, Rainer. Erich Fromm: His Life and Ideas. Translators Ian Portman, Manuela Kunkel. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. ISBN 0-8264-1519-9, ISBN 978-0-8264-1519-6. P. 13:
"For a second name he was given that of his grandfather on his father's side–Seligmann Pinchas Fromm, although the registry office in Frankfurt does not record him as Erich Pinchas Fromm, but as Erich Seligmann Fromm. Also his parents addressed his mail to 'Erich S. Fromm.'"
^ Fromm, Erich “Escape from Freedom” New York: Rinehart & Co., 1941, p. 41 – 42
^ John Rickert, The Fromm-Marcuse debated revisited, 1986 in „Theory and Society“, vol. 15, pp. 351-400. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
^ Erich Fromm, [1955] 1990 The Sane Society, New York: Henry Holt
^ Erich Fromm, [1973] 1992, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, New York: Henry Holt.
[edit] External links
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Erich Fromm
www.erich-fromm.de – Erich Fromm Archives; Literary Estate
www.frommsociety.com - International Erich Fromm Society
Summary of Fromm's life by Rainer Funk
Erich Fromm on the Mystical Site www.mysticism.nl
Clark, Neil. "Wanted: an Erich Fromm party." Guardian Unlimited, February 20, 2007.
Clark, Neil. "Fromm me to you ." Guardian Unlimited, December 14, 2007.
International Foundation Erich Fromm
Erich Fromm Interview Excerpt. youtube.com.
[3] 1958 Mike Wallace interview
首頁
動態消息貼文
8 Save | 自我的追尋 佛洛姆(Erich Fromm)著 孫石譯 福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980) 1995 再版 [10],237面 19公分 | 完整記錄 |
2 Save | 占有或存在 一个新型社会的心灵基础 埃.弗罗姆(Erich Fromm)著 杨慧譯 Chan yu ts'un tsai 福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980) 1989 第1版 [8],185面 21公分 |
Save
在幻想鎖鍊的彼岸 我所理解的馬克斯和弗洛伊德 E.弗洛姆(Erich Fromm)著 Tsai huan hsiang so lien te pian
福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980)
1985
[10],182面 21公分
Save | 夢的精神分析 被遺忘的語言 福若姆(Erich Fromm)原著 葉頌壽譯 Meng te ching shen fen hsi 福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980) 1982 再版 254面,圖版1葉 19公分 | 完整記錄 |
| ||||||
|
Save
禪與心理分析 鈴木大拙,福若姆(Erich Fromm)著 孟祥森譯 Ch'an yü hsin li fen hsi
鈴木 大拙
1980
再版
[4],249面,圖版1葉 圖 19公分
2 Save | 健全的社会 E.弗洛姆[Erich Fromm]著 孙恺详译 福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980) 1994 第1版 293面 20公分 | 完整記錄 |
45 Save | 生命的展現 人類生存情態的分析 艾利赫.佛洛姆(Erich Fromm)著 孟祥森譯 福若姆 (Fromm, Erich, 1900-1980) 1991 初版四刷 238,6面 21公分 |
| |||||
|